|
|
Post by danhiggins on May 30, 2007 14:29:18 GMT -5
I know it's been posted before, but I can't seem to find the thread. The Hornets and Warriors talked about it some. Could someone post the different ratings catagories one more time. i.e. Jumping, Potential, Quickness, etc. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hornets on May 30, 2007 14:47:25 GMT -5
I know it's been posted before, but I can't seem to find the thread. The Hornets and Warriors talked about it some. Could someone post the different ratings catagories one more time. i.e. Jumping, Potential, Quickness, etc. Thank you. InsideScoring JumpShot ThreePointShot Handling Passing Quickness PostDefense PerimeterDefense DriveDefense Stealing ShotBlocking OffenseRebound DefenseRebound Strength Jumping and of course: Potential |
|
|
|
Post by JoeW on May 30, 2007 15:05:41 GMT -5
just to remind everyone, you can't improve categories that involve physical characteristics. So no improving jumping, strength, potential, or quickness.
|
|
|
|
Post by danhiggins on May 30, 2007 15:25:42 GMT -5
Thank you gentlemen. Can we see exactly what our guys have in each catagory, or do we just live with the grades?
|
|
|
|
Post by Hornets on May 30, 2007 15:54:09 GMT -5
Thank you gentlemen. Can we see exactly what our guys have in each catagory, or do we just live with the grades? you can see what your guys have in each category ... just watch them play. Honestly, it wouldn't be fun to know everything, and you get the idea if you're watching closely. btw, the categories mentioned are the ones that hold visible ratings. But there are more. Hidden ones. Or is there any way to explain why guys with identical ratings (and i mean those REAL ratings) behave so differently. Make both primary offensive option in the same system, yet one might shoot 8 times a game while the other one routinely jacks em up 25 times per. There HAS to be a rating for "offensive mindness", i just haven't discovered it yet ... |
|
|
|
Post by Pistons on May 30, 2007 16:38:00 GMT -5
Thanks for posting all these. I had been wondering the same thing myself.
|
|
|
|
Post by JoeW on May 30, 2007 17:09:23 GMT -5
hornets, great theory. It would explain why Spreewell scores very little despite shooting 47 percent from the field. However if there is that category, I have never seen it.
|
|
